April 28, 2023

#107 Unraveling the Future of AI: The Developer's Perspective with Steven Schrembeck

#107 Unraveling the Future of AI: The Developer's Perspective with Steven Schrembeck
Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player badge
Amazon Music podcast player badge
Castro podcast player badge
Overcast podcast player badge
YouTube podcast player badge
Anghami podcast player badge
PocketCasts podcast player badge
RadioPublic podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
Youtube Music podcast player badge
Audacy podcast player badge
Goodpods podcast player badge
PlayerFM podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconAmazon Music podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconOvercast podcast player iconYouTube podcast player iconAnghami podcast player iconPocketCasts podcast player iconRadioPublic podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player iconYoutube Music podcast player iconAudacy podcast player iconGoodpods podcast player iconPlayerFM podcast player icon

In this episode, we sit down with software engineer, AI developer, and storyteller Steven Schrembeck, to discuss his unique insights into the rapidly evolving world of AI and its impact on our lives. From generative AI to prompt engineering, autonomous bots, and the rise of solopreneurs, Steven shares his thoughts on the challenges, opportunities, and potential ethical implications of these technological advancements. Tune in to hear a developer's perspective on the future of AI, the role of creativity, and how it all ties into the world of science fiction.


https://www.youtube.com/@seekingminima

1
00:00:10,000 --> 00:00:12,900
Hello, and welcome to a new
episode of the city of show with

2
00:00:12,900 --> 00:00:14,300
mammoths.
My name is Muhammad.

3
00:00:14,300 --> 00:00:16,700
And as you know, in each
episode, I discussed different

4
00:00:16,700 --> 00:00:18,600
topics about emerging
Technologies.

5
00:00:19,300 --> 00:00:23,400
A I just, in fact formation
cyber security and also, I

6
00:00:23,400 --> 00:00:25,800
sometimes have guests with me
who are subject.

7
00:00:25,800 --> 00:00:29,600
Matter experts in one of the
domains I usually talk about and

8
00:00:29,600 --> 00:00:31,200
today I'm very pleased to have
with me.

9
00:00:31,500 --> 00:00:35,400
Steven shainberg, who's joining
me from the United States from

10
00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:36,900
Georgia?
Steven.

11
00:00:36,900 --> 00:00:39,100
Thank you very much for being on
the show today.

12
00:00:39,100 --> 00:00:40,900
I will keep it.
It to you, to introduce

13
00:00:40,900 --> 00:00:43,800
yourself, what you do, and what
you are up to.

14
00:00:45,400 --> 00:00:50,300
Mmm, some thanks for having me
on so I do three things that are

15
00:00:50,300 --> 00:00:54,000
relevant once I'm the founder of
a start-up called impossible

16
00:00:54,000 --> 00:00:58,500
Labs so it builds a i stuff, it
sounds very fancy but I'm

17
00:00:58,500 --> 00:01:04,300
basically a solopreneur 0 plus
AI plus contractors and I really

18
00:01:04,300 --> 00:01:08,200
liked it that way beyond that I
make videos on a channel called

19
00:01:08,200 --> 00:01:10,900
seeking Minima.
So that's what brought us here

20
00:01:10,900 --> 00:01:13,200
today.
That channel has one purpose and

21
00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:17,100
that is to help people.
Use technology instead of being

22
00:01:17,100 --> 00:01:19,900
used by it and that's sort of my
goal.

23
00:01:20,400 --> 00:01:22,400
And then the last part is I
write stories.

24
00:01:22,800 --> 00:01:25,400
Science Fiction and Fantasy.
Oh wow.

25
00:01:25,800 --> 00:01:28,900
I love this combination really
now.

26
00:01:29,500 --> 00:01:31,500
I know.
Stephen also widened like you

27
00:01:31,500 --> 00:01:34,600
you do software development as
well, right?

28
00:01:35,600 --> 00:01:37,300
That's right.
Yeah, I didn't mention the one

29
00:01:37,300 --> 00:01:39,200
thing that like pays the bills,
right?

30
00:01:39,800 --> 00:01:43,500
So I guess AI does pay the bills
but yeah.

31
00:01:43,500 --> 00:01:47,100
So I've been a software
developer Her for 12 years,

32
00:01:47,100 --> 00:01:50,200
something like that big
corporate software developer.

33
00:01:50,600 --> 00:01:52,700
I made the rounds.
I worked at Amazon for a while

34
00:01:53,400 --> 00:01:58,600
working together companies.
So it's been good to me, but

35
00:01:58,700 --> 00:02:02,600
it's not, it's not as exciting
as cutting-edge Tech which is

36
00:02:02,600 --> 00:02:06,800
always where my heart is.
That That's great.

37
00:02:06,800 --> 00:02:11,500
So, stupid best wore out of
curiosity, like you have a mix

38
00:02:11,500 --> 00:02:14,500
of, you know, multiple things at
the same time.

39
00:02:14,900 --> 00:02:21,800
So what I would say, drove you
to choose this path for your

40
00:02:21,800 --> 00:02:28,600
career.
So, I've moved to different

41
00:02:28,600 --> 00:02:32,100
kinds of software development.
And first of all, I can't help

42
00:02:32,100 --> 00:02:33,900
myself.
That's the easy answer, right?

43
00:02:34,300 --> 00:02:37,400
It's, I can't help it, be
interested in things writing is

44
00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:39,700
something I haven't been able to
put down for a long time.

45
00:02:39,700 --> 00:02:41,800
So that's just like, something
they won't leave me alone.

46
00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:45,000
And same with cutting-edge tech,
right?

47
00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:49,200
I moved into software
development because I liked

48
00:02:49,400 --> 00:02:52,400
building things, I'm not one of
those people that loves code for

49
00:02:52,400 --> 00:02:55,700
code sake.
I like it as a tool.

50
00:02:56,400 --> 00:02:58,700
And while I am fascinated with
building things and

51
00:02:58,700 --> 00:03:02,500
understanding how they work, I'm
more interested in the

52
00:03:02,500 --> 00:03:06,000
opportunity to solve cool
problems and help people.

53
00:03:06,300 --> 00:03:08,800
And software was just the
easiest way to do that because,

54
00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:11,400
you know, it's easy to set up
tear down like there's no

55
00:03:11,400 --> 00:03:14,400
sandbox like software.
So I think that's really what

56
00:03:14,400 --> 00:03:18,200
drew me in and then AI is just
honestly, it felt like

57
00:03:18,200 --> 00:03:21,200
modern-day magic.
I started building models and

58
00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:25,300
2016 when deep learning was
having a first or second

59
00:03:25,300 --> 00:03:27,000
Renaissance to bring it.
How you look at it.

60
00:03:27,300 --> 00:03:31,100
And I knew that this was
computer magic and I wanted to

61
00:03:31,100 --> 00:03:34,800
know how to do it, so that's
what drew me into AI.

62
00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:40,900
That's very, very cool.
I would say, now, do and I know

63
00:03:40,900 --> 00:03:44,100
this is the Hot Topic.
It's on everyone's mind, right?

64
00:03:44,100 --> 00:03:49,600
So it's a, i how do you perceive
it from?

65
00:03:50,200 --> 00:03:53,200
Not only a developer
perspective, a solopreneur

66
00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:55,800
perspective.
How do you do to a?

67
00:03:55,800 --> 00:03:59,900
I do you, do you see it as you
know, the technology that were,

68
00:04:01,000 --> 00:04:05,100
you know, make really people's
life easy or do you see it?

69
00:04:05,200 --> 00:04:10,700
It more as a just a cool
technology that we can do cool

70
00:04:10,700 --> 00:04:14,100
stuff with it.
How do you perceive really the

71
00:04:14,100 --> 00:04:16,800
technology because there are not
having that is now asking you

72
00:04:16,800 --> 00:04:21,000
step at this question, there are
a lot of debates recently with

73
00:04:21,100 --> 00:04:24,800
all the hype that happened after
chat GPT, and all these

74
00:04:24,800 --> 00:04:27,800
Technologies what's next.
What's going to happen in the

75
00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:30,800
world.
So from a developer perspective,

76
00:04:30,800 --> 00:04:38,500
a solopreneur perspective, what
you can tell us about this So, a

77
00:04:38,508 --> 00:04:40,200
lot of the time the hype isn't
real.

78
00:04:40,600 --> 00:04:44,300
So I also, you know, I'm very
interested in web three mostly

79
00:04:44,300 --> 00:04:46,200
can for like coordination
Technologies.

80
00:04:46,400 --> 00:04:50,000
I'm terrible at a terrible
writing the height wave.

81
00:04:50,000 --> 00:04:51,900
I'm always interested in the
tech in the values.

82
00:04:52,900 --> 00:04:55,900
So for AI this time the hype is
kind of real.

83
00:04:56,200 --> 00:04:59,800
And it was last time too.
If you'll recall, I don't know

84
00:04:59,800 --> 00:05:01,900
what 45 years ago.
The last time deep learning

85
00:05:01,900 --> 00:05:03,900
really took off, it was for a
vision networks.

86
00:05:04,100 --> 00:05:08,000
And this is really where the
killer use case was and The hype

87
00:05:08,000 --> 00:05:12,000
was real, it just wasn't evenly
distributed now, as you know,

88
00:05:12,000 --> 00:05:14,500
diffusion networks for a
generative Ai and large

89
00:05:14,500 --> 00:05:17,400
language, models are the latest
hotness in.

90
00:05:17,400 --> 00:05:22,500
The hyperbole is real again.
And I think the reason that we

91
00:05:22,500 --> 00:05:28,000
might not see another AI winter
between here, and I really doing

92
00:05:28,500 --> 00:05:33,900
very impactful things to society
is because we have a lot of Lego

93
00:05:33,900 --> 00:05:37,500
blocks that we built up.
If you followed AI development,

94
00:05:37,600 --> 00:05:40,900
The past decade or so, it keeps
increasing.

95
00:05:41,400 --> 00:05:44,400
But what has happened is that
everyone was increasing in their

96
00:05:44,400 --> 00:05:46,900
own silos.
So you know, latch natural

97
00:05:46,900 --> 00:05:51,100
language processing was getting
better time, series analysis was

98
00:05:51,100 --> 00:05:53,600
getting better, just Transformer
networks.

99
00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:56,100
All all the vision networks.
All of these things were

100
00:05:56,100 --> 00:05:57,800
improving.
Diffusion, autoencoders.

101
00:05:57,800 --> 00:05:59,900
All these things were improving
separately.

102
00:06:00,500 --> 00:06:05,200
And what happened is people from
One domain connected at these

103
00:06:05,500 --> 00:06:08,000
two, another domains.
And this case it was Enforcement

104
00:06:08,000 --> 00:06:12,700
learning plus natural language
processing and plus, and that

105
00:06:12,700 --> 00:06:15,600
was basically you connect two
pieces from two verticals that

106
00:06:15,600 --> 00:06:18,600
have been advancing for a long
time and the result was

107
00:06:18,600 --> 00:06:21,000
exponential increase.
It could do things.

108
00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:24,400
The difference was, we have
generative networks, we've had

109
00:06:24,400 --> 00:06:27,300
Gans for a long time that there
are sort of obtuse and really

110
00:06:27,300 --> 00:06:31,700
hard to train.
The difference is we needed we

111
00:06:31,700 --> 00:06:34,900
needed an interface that
understood what we meant.

112
00:06:35,200 --> 00:06:37,000
That was the big, like unlock
here.

113
00:06:37,600 --> 00:06:41,400
Is that we could always sort of
get networks to do really good

114
00:06:41,400 --> 00:06:44,800
things narrowly, but we couldn't
interface with them in a very

115
00:06:44,800 --> 00:06:48,500
good way.
If they know something like like

116
00:06:48,500 --> 00:06:51,500
a large language model does how
do you get the information out

117
00:06:51,500 --> 00:06:53,900
of it?
And I think that natural

118
00:06:53,900 --> 00:06:56,200
language processing was an
interface moment.

119
00:06:56,500 --> 00:07:00,300
So the combination of all these
individual and advancements.

120
00:07:00,600 --> 00:07:05,700
Is really why you're seeing huge
changes now and the amount of

121
00:07:05,700 --> 00:07:07,600
individual advancement has not
stopped.

122
00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:10,900
So I would be very surprised if
there were not more verticals to

123
00:07:10,900 --> 00:07:15,400
combine and again, create
another ridiculous pivotal

124
00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:18,900
moment every six months or so,
but you might see lows in the

125
00:07:18,900 --> 00:07:20,900
meantime so I'd say, the hype is
real.

126
00:07:20,900 --> 00:07:25,500
Sort of right?
People always tend to overhype,

127
00:07:25,500 --> 00:07:29,200
no matter what you do, he
actually Stephen.

128
00:07:29,200 --> 00:07:34,000
The you said, An important which
I discussed couple of episodes

129
00:07:34,000 --> 00:07:37,000
back.
I go solo sometime and I said

130
00:07:37,000 --> 00:07:40,700
like I'm a no not very well guy
but I'm an old guy enough to

131
00:07:40,700 --> 00:07:45,200
remember all the times in
history and I don't remember him

132
00:07:45,200 --> 00:07:48,000
moment.
No similar to what we are seeing

133
00:07:48,000 --> 00:07:53,000
today because I was like, maybe
10, 11 years old, when the first

134
00:07:53,000 --> 00:07:56,800
time I heard about the internet,
you know, I was 14 years old

135
00:07:56,800 --> 00:08:00,100
when I tried the internet and
then you know, later on the

136
00:08:00,700 --> 00:08:05,400
Smartphone that web to.
Yeah.

137
00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:08,700
Like then was sometimes
exaggeration sometimes, you know

138
00:08:08,700 --> 00:08:11,700
things going.
But you know that the cycle used

139
00:08:11,700 --> 00:08:14,500
to take very long until we see
the next thing.

140
00:08:14,500 --> 00:08:19,200
But with a II mean generative Ai
and the in LPS and you know,

141
00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:21,200
this all models that we are
seeing today.

142
00:08:21,200 --> 00:08:24,200
I think we, as you said, I like
the word.

143
00:08:24,200 --> 00:08:27,400
You set an ER we get we will not
see an AI wind.

144
00:08:27,800 --> 00:08:31,500
I love this expression and I
think we are Are going very

145
00:08:31,500 --> 00:08:33,900
fast.
Now from me I would say

146
00:08:33,900 --> 00:08:38,700
developer perspective, right?
What do you think would be the

147
00:08:38,700 --> 00:08:43,200
best applications?
That let me make it very certain

148
00:08:43,200 --> 00:08:47,800
that everyone can benefit on
other than you know the I would

149
00:08:47,800 --> 00:08:52,400
say the sometimes very simple
things, we see, write me an

150
00:08:52,400 --> 00:08:56,100
email right miss this.
So I believe like from your

151
00:08:56,100 --> 00:08:58,300
perspective, Stephen you see a
bigger picture?

152
00:08:58,300 --> 00:09:00,500
Can you shave that with from
your past?

153
00:09:02,200 --> 00:09:05,600
Yeah.
I think another reason why this

154
00:09:05,600 --> 00:09:10,600
time it's different is we have a
very general model a shockingly

155
00:09:10,600 --> 00:09:13,500
general model.
Meaning you can, it can reason

156
00:09:13,500 --> 00:09:16,300
about things, right?
Whether it doesn't really matter

157
00:09:16,300 --> 00:09:18,400
what's happening under the hood,
all that matters is the input

158
00:09:18,400 --> 00:09:21,200
output results in something that
looks like commodified

159
00:09:21,200 --> 00:09:23,500
intelligence.
It's a brain in a box you can

160
00:09:23,500 --> 00:09:25,800
spin it up.
That's not super smart.

161
00:09:25,800 --> 00:09:29,000
It's like maybe average adult
smart and then in a couple

162
00:09:29,000 --> 00:09:33,100
domains it's exceptionally smart
like law or some solving sat.

163
00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:36,800
Holmes.
But what matters is that you

164
00:09:36,800 --> 00:09:39,200
have common sense reasoning in a
box.

165
00:09:39,300 --> 00:09:42,200
That's the kind of thing that
honestly I expected to take a

166
00:09:42,200 --> 00:09:44,800
lot longer and I think a lot of
people did I did not see this

167
00:09:44,800 --> 00:09:46,700
one coming.
Next there was a number of

168
00:09:46,708 --> 00:09:49,500
hurdles to artificial general
intelligence and I didn't think

169
00:09:49,500 --> 00:09:52,400
this one was going to get
knocked over first or next.

170
00:09:52,400 --> 00:09:55,700
Anyway.
So really when you think about

171
00:09:55,700 --> 00:09:59,800
how can I use this What could
you ask somebody that you could

172
00:09:59,800 --> 00:10:03,100
pay minimum wage or just
somebody with no training of

173
00:10:03,100 --> 00:10:05,500
average intelligence to do for
you on a computer?

174
00:10:06,500 --> 00:10:10,600
Now you can do that for instead
of fifteen dollars an hour

175
00:10:10,600 --> 00:10:15,000
depending where you live, you
can do that for 20 cents and you

176
00:10:15,000 --> 00:10:19,300
can do it a thousand times
faster and you can have 100,000

177
00:10:19,300 --> 00:10:23,000
of them working.
So what can you do with that?

178
00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:28,000
Well, any information processing
is if your job is in Mission

179
00:10:28,000 --> 00:10:32,200
processing.
That's a i job now and you're

180
00:10:32,200 --> 00:10:34,300
going to do something else.
So it's kind of hollowing out

181
00:10:34,300 --> 00:10:37,500
the middle.
It's hollowing out people who

182
00:10:37,500 --> 00:10:40,500
work on if your job is to turn
one piece of information into

183
00:10:40,500 --> 00:10:44,800
another piece of information, if
there is a broad skill set, and

184
00:10:44,800 --> 00:10:47,700
data set for what you do, you're
going to be replaced pretty

185
00:10:47,700 --> 00:10:52,000
quickly depending on the
economic output of what it's

186
00:10:52,000 --> 00:10:56,200
worth to replace you.
Except if you're a specialist

187
00:10:56,400 --> 00:10:59,600
there is is very hard to replace
specialist.

188
00:10:59,600 --> 00:11:04,600
So I know a person whose job is
to audit oil and gas Refinery

189
00:11:05,100 --> 00:11:08,400
machinery for safety and even
though his job is basically, to

190
00:11:08,400 --> 00:11:12,500
analyze data and spit out, okay?
Safe, not safe, do mate.

191
00:11:12,500 --> 00:11:15,900
Most don't do maintenance
replace, he's not had to be

192
00:11:15,900 --> 00:11:19,800
replaced for a very long time
because it's such a specialized

193
00:11:19,800 --> 00:11:25,300
knowledge set that he's fine.
So if your job Is pretty generic

194
00:11:25,700 --> 00:11:29,500
Junior coder with no
specialization or pretty generic

195
00:11:29,500 --> 00:11:32,600
Junior.
Designer who just does websites.

196
00:11:33,900 --> 00:11:35,800
You should consider using other
things.

197
00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:37,600
Now, I think your question was
to ask.

198
00:11:38,200 --> 00:11:41,500
How can people use this?
That was sort of like the - some

199
00:11:41,500 --> 00:11:45,400
dinner, which it's a lot of
attention, but the positive side

200
00:11:45,400 --> 00:11:47,600
is True to.
This is commodified intelligence

201
00:11:47,600 --> 00:11:50,600
in a box.
If something if there's enough

202
00:11:50,600 --> 00:11:54,100
data you can generate it.
That's the very Nothing.

203
00:11:56,100 --> 00:12:01,500
I can tell you that what I'm you
for is to remove is to really

204
00:12:01,500 --> 00:12:05,800
take control of my sort of.
To fight back against the

205
00:12:05,800 --> 00:12:08,700
attention economy I guess, is
the right way of putting it.

206
00:12:08,900 --> 00:12:12,100
So just for instance, yesterday
actually this morning and last

207
00:12:12,100 --> 00:12:16,100
night, I wrote a tool that uses
open my eyes whisper to

208
00:12:16,100 --> 00:12:19,300
transcribe podcasts.
So, takes from audio to text

209
00:12:19,500 --> 00:12:22,600
transcript including speaker
attribution, so who's talking.

210
00:12:23,100 --> 00:12:26,400
And then it takes that pumps it
into chat gbt for through the

211
00:12:26,400 --> 00:12:31,000
API and then I run it through a
prompt where I tell it

212
00:12:31,000 --> 00:12:33,200
basically.
All right, here's the questions.

213
00:12:33,200 --> 00:12:35,800
I'm going to ask hear this.
Things I need to know about this

214
00:12:35,800 --> 00:12:37,300
podcast.
Here are the viewpoints, I want

215
00:12:37,300 --> 00:12:39,900
to see, and then it just curates
this report.

216
00:12:40,100 --> 00:12:42,800
So there are certain podcast
will say, like macro investing,

217
00:12:42,800 --> 00:12:44,300
right?
I really care about this too

218
00:12:44,300 --> 00:12:45,200
much.
I want to know.

219
00:12:45,200 --> 00:12:47,100
Roughly, you know, where the
markets are.

220
00:12:47,400 --> 00:12:48,500
I don't want to pay attention
to.

221
00:12:48,500 --> 00:12:50,900
It news is makes you feel long
enough.

222
00:12:51,300 --> 00:12:54,700
And now with the push of a
button, here's everything I need

223
00:12:54,700 --> 00:12:57,900
to know, distilled down into a
tiny amount and I can curate

224
00:12:57,900 --> 00:13:00,800
that for many podcast feed and
this is just stuff I'm making.

225
00:13:01,100 --> 00:13:06,900
So I am using it to sort of Get
more information and learn more

226
00:13:06,900 --> 00:13:11,200
than I could before, and under
to learn quickly.

227
00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:15,300
And to synthesize information,
I'm using it like intelligence

228
00:13:15,300 --> 00:13:18,800
in a box.
Hey, read this for me, I hate

229
00:13:18,800 --> 00:13:23,400
distill this down but only in
the places where my goal is just

230
00:13:23,400 --> 00:13:25,100
information.
So if you want to be Matrix

231
00:13:25,100 --> 00:13:28,200
mainlined just plug me in.
Like I just want to know how to

232
00:13:28,200 --> 00:13:31,200
do this.
This is a killer use case.

233
00:13:31,200 --> 00:13:34,100
Right now for anybody, you don't
have to know how to program,

234
00:13:34,600 --> 00:13:37,400
just interfacing with the the
chat clients is enough.

235
00:13:38,300 --> 00:13:41,400
You could be learning really,
really quickly, right now.

236
00:13:42,100 --> 00:13:46,000
And so this is the sort of this
is the trade, then we have an

237
00:13:46,000 --> 00:13:49,100
opportunity where AI is really
really useful at helping you

238
00:13:49,100 --> 00:13:52,400
learn just about anything that
makes you very marketable right

239
00:13:52,400 --> 00:13:57,400
now or you can ignore it and sit
around and wait for it to your

240
00:13:57,400 --> 00:14:02,300
job to be slowly eating away.
So it's like you can have you

241
00:14:02,300 --> 00:14:05,300
can really stand out right now.
If you're willing to do the work

242
00:14:05,300 --> 00:14:08,600
and learn and try these things
out or you can, you know, wait

243
00:14:08,600 --> 00:14:11,600
on the sidelines.
Wow.

244
00:14:11,800 --> 00:14:14,100
Do you know that what you are
trying to bring?

245
00:14:14,100 --> 00:14:17,800
This is a something similar
other have been met exactly the

246
00:14:17,800 --> 00:14:22,500
same idea.
But I wanted to I didn't lie or

247
00:14:22,500 --> 00:14:25,200
preparing this podcast on some
news feed.

248
00:14:25,200 --> 00:14:31,200
So and one of the use cases like
thought is Led GPT or whatever

249
00:14:31,200 --> 00:14:34,700
the API read these feeds and
just select which ones are

250
00:14:34,700 --> 00:14:38,000
important.
So I can choose a topic for

251
00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:41,700
example.
Now you mentioned the word from

252
00:14:41,900 --> 00:14:45,700
several times and there was a
hype, if we can call it apart

253
00:14:46,200 --> 00:14:49,600
from the engineers, right?
So prompt engineers and you

254
00:14:49,600 --> 00:14:53,400
know, A New Perspective and
let's discuss it both you know

255
00:14:53,400 --> 00:14:57,500
from a real software development
perspective and plus you know

256
00:14:57,700 --> 00:15:02,500
realistic use case perspective.
How important is the prom.

257
00:15:02,800 --> 00:15:09,500
When interacting with models
like chatty Beauty Ideally over

258
00:15:09,500 --> 00:15:12,000
time, the prompt becomes less
important.

259
00:15:12,400 --> 00:15:15,400
If you have a good natural
language model, the goal is for

260
00:15:15,400 --> 00:15:18,700
to be a better interface.
So I'll just take a step back

261
00:15:18,700 --> 00:15:21,200
and do a little technical
explanation that I guess

262
00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:23,700
beautifully doesn't put people
to sleep, but I think is very

263
00:15:23,700 --> 00:15:27,200
useful for understanding how
these things work.

264
00:15:27,700 --> 00:15:33,000
So at the center of these large
language models and even stuff,

265
00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:37,200
like diffusion models is
something that researchers call

266
00:15:37,200 --> 00:15:40,300
a latent space.
Which in my opinion, they just

267
00:15:40,300 --> 00:15:42,900
use a technical sounding term to
describe something is very

268
00:15:42,900 --> 00:15:45,300
complicated.
I like to think of it as just

269
00:15:45,300 --> 00:15:49,200
this big information soup, it's
encoded in a sort of machine

270
00:15:49,200 --> 00:15:51,100
language.
It's just a representation that

271
00:15:51,100 --> 00:15:54,800
the model has learned about the
word the world in the most dense

272
00:15:54,800 --> 00:15:56,300
format.
This is the center of

273
00:15:56,300 --> 00:15:58,600
everything.
It knows, this is where it's

274
00:15:58,600 --> 00:16:02,100
recorded, all the information,
it knows all the patterns it

275
00:16:02,100 --> 00:16:04,500
needs to find.
You can think of it.

276
00:16:04,600 --> 00:16:08,300
It's like it's repository of
knowledge but it's not in words.

277
00:16:08,400 --> 00:16:12,900
It's in technically in
embeddings, it's just hyper

278
00:16:12,900 --> 00:16:17,500
compressed information so it
knows a lot of stuff about a lot

279
00:16:17,500 --> 00:16:18,800
of stuff.
You know.

280
00:16:18,800 --> 00:16:22,800
The, the open AI models have
read a bulk of the public

281
00:16:22,800 --> 00:16:26,900
internet.
So they know a lot of things.

282
00:16:26,900 --> 00:16:29,400
In fact, I know a lot more than
we can pull out of them.

283
00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:33,300
And so a lot of the trick is,
how do we get out?

284
00:16:33,300 --> 00:16:36,500
I know you can do this.
How do I get you to know what I

285
00:16:36,508 --> 00:16:38,300
mean?
It's like an sent Tha size.

286
00:16:38,800 --> 00:16:41,100
Either do these operations,
write this code.

287
00:16:41,100 --> 00:16:43,000
Perform these tasks.
Help me again.

288
00:16:43,000 --> 00:16:46,000
Read this thing, understand what
I'm trying to get.

289
00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:50,600
So that interface gap between, I
know you have this information

290
00:16:50,600 --> 00:16:53,200
in your latent space and this
ocean of information.

291
00:16:53,300 --> 00:16:56,500
I know you can do this.
I'm trying to get you to focus,

292
00:16:56,500 --> 00:17:00,000
only on what I want you to do
and there's some misalignment

293
00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:02,100
there.
So there's a gap in the

294
00:17:02,100 --> 00:17:05,000
interface which is do, you know
what I mean?

295
00:17:05,200 --> 00:17:07,400
And can use it in.
Pull it out of what you actually

296
00:17:07,400 --> 00:17:10,200
know how to do.
So that's what prompted

297
00:17:10,200 --> 00:17:13,400
engineering right now.
Solves for is, can you shrink

298
00:17:13,400 --> 00:17:16,500
that Gap to be better at
synthesizing?

299
00:17:16,500 --> 00:17:18,700
What you want from these large
language models.

300
00:17:19,000 --> 00:17:24,200
So right now it is useful.
I will probably be useful for a

301
00:17:24,200 --> 00:17:28,900
while but in theory as things
get better, that interface

302
00:17:28,900 --> 00:17:31,900
should get better and the models
will get better and better at

303
00:17:31,900 --> 00:17:35,400
understanding what you want so
that you don't have to use all

304
00:17:35,400 --> 00:17:37,700
these tricks of the trade.
So I wouldn't say there's a

305
00:17:37,700 --> 00:17:41,600
super long Long shelf life on
this skill but I could be wrong.

306
00:17:43,400 --> 00:17:47,700
At that cool fish me, you know
like because yesterday when

307
00:17:47,900 --> 00:17:51,000
actually in the during the week
at one of the things I was

308
00:17:51,000 --> 00:17:58,300
trying to do is to let the model
tells me how best it prefers to

309
00:17:58,300 --> 00:18:04,300
be interacted with.
And yeah I spend some time until

310
00:18:04,300 --> 00:18:10,100
at actively you people might
love but I told Chad GPT after I

311
00:18:10,100 --> 00:18:13,100
get the answer I wanted.
I said okay Okay, can we write

312
00:18:13,100 --> 00:18:17,100
any book about the and put some
examples and they did?

313
00:18:17,300 --> 00:18:23,000
So as per chair GPT it prefers
to have the following a context

314
00:18:23,400 --> 00:18:28,900
specificity instruction purpose
or goal and limitation.

315
00:18:28,900 --> 00:18:33,300
So this is what I was told by
GPT and it gave me an example,

316
00:18:33,300 --> 00:18:35,000
by the way, if you ask me this
way.

317
00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:36,900
Exactly.
As you said, Stephen, I know

318
00:18:36,900 --> 00:18:40,800
that I should search exactly in
this, you know, I don't have to

319
00:18:40,800 --> 00:18:43,500
go search the whole language.
There's now more than because I

320
00:18:43,500 --> 00:18:46,400
know exactly what I have to go.
So this is maybe where the

321
00:18:46,400 --> 00:18:49,000
prompt engineering, but I
believe, you know, I have a

322
00:18:49,008 --> 00:18:51,400
little bit of technical
background and I know a little

323
00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:54,100
bit how these models work.
I think the more they are

324
00:18:54,100 --> 00:18:57,400
trained, the better they get.
So even you will not need even

325
00:18:58,000 --> 00:19:01,400
know an exact from to get the
information out of it, right?

326
00:19:01,600 --> 00:19:04,800
So that's that's very, very
cool.

327
00:19:04,800 --> 00:19:08,000
I would say.
Now here, I want to ask you.

328
00:19:08,000 --> 00:19:12,400
Now, we have this moment, I
would say, What do you think

329
00:19:12,500 --> 00:19:16,000
other technology is really get
combined or let's say, you know,

330
00:19:16,100 --> 00:19:21,900
used together with the, you
know, all this AI Technologies.

331
00:19:22,100 --> 00:19:25,800
Like for example personally, I
think automation with Arie play

332
00:19:25,800 --> 00:19:28,200
a huge role.
I started to see, you know,

333
00:19:28,200 --> 00:19:32,800
someone talked about autonomous
boats that they can interact,

334
00:19:32,800 --> 00:19:36,200
you know, with each other.
What's your view on this?

335
00:19:37,400 --> 00:19:39,500
All right, so use this.
Let's like three.

336
00:19:39,500 --> 00:19:47,300
Good questions. so, I think that
there's a lot of it will be

337
00:19:47,300 --> 00:19:51,400
combined with everything it's
intelligence, so it gets

338
00:19:51,400 --> 00:19:53,700
combined with everything but I
think the ones that are sort of

339
00:19:53,700 --> 00:19:57,100
Juicy and next, I actually don't
think it's automation.

340
00:19:57,100 --> 00:20:00,100
Now I could be wrong.
There is a lot of value there.

341
00:20:00,900 --> 00:20:03,300
So I think it's more like
narrowly.

342
00:20:03,300 --> 00:20:05,700
There are new kinds of
automation that we just unlocked

343
00:20:05,700 --> 00:20:08,700
and those yeah that's Greenfield
that'll be anything that

344
00:20:08,700 --> 00:20:10,300
required like Common Sense
reasoning.

345
00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:14,200
I think those things there is.
Okay, automation will move

346
00:20:14,200 --> 00:20:16,400
forward.
The reason I don't think that

347
00:20:16,400 --> 00:20:20,300
this is the automation moment.
I mean, physical movement and

348
00:20:20,300 --> 00:20:24,500
Manufacturing stuff in the real
world is because physical stuff

349
00:20:24,500 --> 00:20:28,400
is hard.
It's hard and expensive, and

350
00:20:28,400 --> 00:20:32,800
physics is finicky, and moving
stuff around in the real world

351
00:20:32,800 --> 00:20:36,700
requires precision, and rules
and money.

352
00:20:37,200 --> 00:20:40,000
And a lot of testing that is a
lot slower than doing stuff in

353
00:20:40,000 --> 00:20:41,800
the digital world.
And this is something that

354
00:20:41,800 --> 00:20:46,500
surprised me, but as soon as I
saw, Asian is that year ago,

355
00:20:46,500 --> 00:20:48,800
something like that?
When stable diffusion first came

356
00:20:48,800 --> 00:20:52,500
out I knew immediately that oh I
was wrong.

357
00:20:53,100 --> 00:20:57,200
It's not automation, it's coming
for knowledge workers.

358
00:20:57,200 --> 00:21:02,000
First it coming for everything
so that sounds very Sinister but

359
00:21:02,000 --> 00:21:04,400
like because that's where the
data is not only is that with

360
00:21:04,400 --> 00:21:09,000
it, the data is, but the people
building these things, this is

361
00:21:09,000 --> 00:21:12,100
what they understand.
All right, they understand how

362
00:21:12,100 --> 00:21:15,400
to use computers, how to do
information jobs how How to

363
00:21:15,400 --> 00:21:19,400
program how to do design.
So not only they have the data

364
00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:22,100
sets but this is a set of
domains, they understand.

365
00:21:22,100 --> 00:21:24,800
So knowledge work will be
automated actually before

366
00:21:24,800 --> 00:21:28,100
robots.
So hilariously it, the plumbers

367
00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:31,600
and the mechanics and even the
factory workers of the world

368
00:21:31,600 --> 00:21:34,400
that will probably be gainfully
employed.

369
00:21:34,500 --> 00:21:38,200
You no longer than the you sort
of Silicon Valley types which

370
00:21:38,200 --> 00:21:43,600
isn't highly amusing.
But again, if that sounds sort

371
00:21:43,600 --> 00:21:46,800
of dark, I think the other ways
I would combine this.

372
00:21:46,800 --> 00:21:48,600
I can just tell you what I'm
doing.

373
00:21:49,200 --> 00:21:52,300
One of the products I'm most
excited about is called intent.

374
00:21:53,100 --> 00:21:56,700
So I'm trying to build a system
that literally watches your

375
00:21:56,700 --> 00:21:59,500
screen.
So this is a combination with

376
00:21:59,500 --> 00:22:02,700
other data streams.
So it's, it's using Vision

377
00:22:02,700 --> 00:22:06,600
that's to watch your screen and
it knows what you're doing all

378
00:22:06,600 --> 00:22:09,100
the time private.
So it runs on just your

379
00:22:09,100 --> 00:22:12,000
computer.
I just It's a stream of it

380
00:22:12,000 --> 00:22:12,900
answers.
The question.

381
00:22:13,100 --> 00:22:16,300
What did I do all day?
It literally just keeps a log

382
00:22:16,600 --> 00:22:20,100
because it can understand what
you're up to you right now.

383
00:22:20,100 --> 00:22:22,800
You're doing an interview and it
can log Moment by moment.

384
00:22:22,800 --> 00:22:26,000
So at face value it's just
analytics but the real goal is

385
00:22:26,000 --> 00:22:28,200
to do executive Control
software.

386
00:22:28,400 --> 00:22:32,800
So sort of you tell it what you
want to do and it sort of keeps

387
00:22:32,800 --> 00:22:35,200
you in line.
It's doing that.

388
00:22:35,200 --> 00:22:36,400
Why are you up at 2:00 a.m.
watching?

389
00:22:36,400 --> 00:22:39,000
Anime shouldn't be doing that.
You said you didn't want to.

390
00:22:39,400 --> 00:22:44,000
So it's sort of like out Forcing
your higher mind to keep your

391
00:22:44,000 --> 00:22:48,800
lower mines in check and but
ultimately, I want to combine

392
00:22:49,600 --> 00:22:53,400
information from other things.
So wearables is a big one.

393
00:22:54,000 --> 00:22:56,800
Anything that a I just wants
data.

394
00:22:56,800 --> 00:22:59,300
So anytime it's I have an aura
ring, right?

395
00:22:59,300 --> 00:23:02,600
It has all my sleep data as well
as continuous like Biometrics,

396
00:23:03,000 --> 00:23:04,000
wow.
That would be great to

397
00:23:04,000 --> 00:23:07,400
incorporate into the thing that
knows everything about my goals.

398
00:23:07,400 --> 00:23:10,500
And what I'm doing all the time
and these things just stack on

399
00:23:10,500 --> 00:23:13,500
top of Of each other.
So I would say anything that has

400
00:23:13,500 --> 00:23:17,500
a consistent high quality amount
of data or data and large

401
00:23:17,500 --> 00:23:21,900
volumes is going to be very
useful.

402
00:23:22,800 --> 00:23:26,400
If I had to bet on a dark horse,
interaction with AI that most

403
00:23:26,400 --> 00:23:28,300
people don't see coming.
I'd say it's probably

404
00:23:28,300 --> 00:23:35,000
brain-computer interfaces most
likely in terms of consumer EEG.

405
00:23:35,800 --> 00:23:39,100
Yes, I think meta and apple both
have EG coming out, incorporated

406
00:23:39,100 --> 00:23:41,800
into wearables.
Can do more than you would

407
00:23:41,800 --> 00:23:47,100
expect.
So that's probably plus

408
00:23:47,100 --> 00:23:49,800
information, brain, computer
interface information in.

409
00:23:50,800 --> 00:23:53,700
You can do that through sensory
augmentation will go into it,

410
00:23:54,200 --> 00:23:56,200
but turns out the brain is
pretty good at getting

411
00:23:56,200 --> 00:24:00,100
information into it.
If you train it, that one is

412
00:24:00,100 --> 00:24:02,900
also pretty interesting.
So I think people are going to

413
00:24:02,900 --> 00:24:06,300
start to chafe at how slow
information goes out and into

414
00:24:06,300 --> 00:24:10,700
their brains and they're going
to be interested in more or

415
00:24:10,700 --> 00:24:14,600
less. he's hooking up to these
systems all the time and these

416
00:24:14,600 --> 00:24:18,000
are the tools that enable that
You may have asked another

417
00:24:18,000 --> 00:24:20,000
question but those answers I got
for you.

418
00:24:20,500 --> 00:24:24,600
No, no, that's that's completely
fine and at it made sense

419
00:24:24,600 --> 00:24:27,900
because you know anything which
is as you said today, I think

420
00:24:27,900 --> 00:24:31,700
data actually these language
models lives on data, right?

421
00:24:31,700 --> 00:24:36,000
So they need to select data to
give us back what we want and I

422
00:24:36,000 --> 00:24:42,300
think maybe something later 22.
If we think consumer perspective

423
00:24:42,300 --> 00:24:46,800
sensors, you know anything that
comes from cameras and beasts.

424
00:24:47,500 --> 00:24:52,100
In industrial vertical I can
think about so about sensors and

425
00:24:52,100 --> 00:24:56,100
this kind of thing.
So yeah, now question that came

426
00:24:56,100 --> 00:24:58,100
to my mind, just out of
curiosity.

427
00:24:58,100 --> 00:25:00,600
Honestly.
Like, of course, I'm too much

428
00:25:00,600 --> 00:25:06,000
into the anything similar to
open a i and there are a couple

429
00:25:06,000 --> 00:25:09,800
of others, but when it comes to,
you know, something like

430
00:25:09,800 --> 00:25:16,800
statement of huge and like mine
Journey, like very Delhi to I

431
00:25:16,800 --> 00:25:22,100
want to understand person is so.
So consider me a guy that he's

432
00:25:22,100 --> 00:25:24,100
not from a technical background
now.

433
00:25:24,200 --> 00:25:29,200
So for me, what I see is that
this algorithm is or whatever

434
00:25:29,200 --> 00:25:31,800
you want to call them to
generate for you meet.

435
00:25:31,800 --> 00:25:32,400
Yes.
Right.

436
00:25:32,400 --> 00:25:40,000
So whether it's a photos or kind
of paintings but what are really

437
00:25:40,000 --> 00:25:45,500
the real uses or really word use
cases that we can get out of

438
00:25:45,800 --> 00:25:50,400
this.
Like Steve diffusion or minder.

439
00:25:52,200 --> 00:25:55,700
I think people would probably be
shocked about what is currently

440
00:25:55,700 --> 00:25:59,300
in development.
It takes a long time to build

441
00:25:59,300 --> 00:26:04,300
production systems for really
you get this Cambrian explosion

442
00:26:04,300 --> 00:26:08,200
of, like, people eat up the easy
use cases first just slapping

443
00:26:08,200 --> 00:26:10,800
user interface on chat GPT or
stable.

444
00:26:10,800 --> 00:26:13,100
Diffusion cool, there you go.
Now you can edit photos.

445
00:26:13,200 --> 00:26:16,800
That's great cool you make
people disappear in photos.

446
00:26:16,900 --> 00:26:19,100
All right?
Now what you can generate our

447
00:26:19,100 --> 00:26:23,500
who cares But you should really
consider this more.

448
00:26:23,500 --> 00:26:27,100
Like, by the way, there are
other really good generative

449
00:26:27,100 --> 00:26:31,700
networks Transformer Network are
competing against diffusion now

450
00:26:31,800 --> 00:26:33,900
and I think it's only a matter
of time until they end up

451
00:26:33,900 --> 00:26:35,800
working together.
They have different strengths.

452
00:26:35,800 --> 00:26:40,500
So, generative information is
really it's not slowing down

453
00:26:40,500 --> 00:26:42,400
either.
I think you should look at this

454
00:26:42,400 --> 00:26:45,300
not as generating media,
although it does do that.

455
00:26:45,400 --> 00:26:49,400
And that will have a profound
impact particularly in terms of

456
00:26:49,400 --> 00:26:53,800
meeting identity Solutions and
probably the death of the public

457
00:26:53,800 --> 00:26:57,600
Anonymous internet.
In a way, but that's okay.

458
00:26:58,200 --> 00:27:01,800
It will bring other good things
too, but it's more like

459
00:27:01,800 --> 00:27:05,600
generative information.
So, here's an example that I

460
00:27:05,600 --> 00:27:11,700
like to give you should think of
these things as being Really

461
00:27:11,700 --> 00:27:15,400
good at generating things to
about 80 or 90% Fidelity.

462
00:27:16,300 --> 00:27:18,600
They're not so good at
generating it to 100%.

463
00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:21,600
So let's say you're, I don't
know, you're an aircraft

464
00:27:21,600 --> 00:27:25,200
designer at Boeing, or you
design cars, you your job is

465
00:27:25,200 --> 00:27:29,300
going to look more like sitting
back crossing your arms and

466
00:27:29,300 --> 00:27:33,300
saying OK, I want something.
That is Sleek powerful uses this

467
00:27:33,300 --> 00:27:36,600
last year's model, show me forty
different combinations.

468
00:27:36,700 --> 00:27:38,400
Whoop, here they are.
That one.

469
00:27:39,000 --> 00:27:42,700
Okay, now given this One make
four different variations of

470
00:27:42,700 --> 00:27:46,500
this, run it through the, you
know, the stream or the the

471
00:27:46,500 --> 00:27:49,500
tests for wind resistance and
all this stuff, great.

472
00:27:49,600 --> 00:27:51,700
I'll come back after lunch.
Okay, here it is.

473
00:27:51,800 --> 00:27:54,000
Here's your model.
That would have taken you how

474
00:27:54,000 --> 00:27:57,200
long with clay models or even
just like going in with computer

475
00:27:57,200 --> 00:28:00,600
models?
Well unbelievable, the amount of

476
00:28:00,600 --> 00:28:08,200
testing an idea Yet the cost of
testing out ideas is going to

477
00:28:08,200 --> 00:28:12,500
zero and that's going to have a
very big impact on Innovation,

478
00:28:12,800 --> 00:28:15,600
which is not really well
captured right now or understood

479
00:28:16,100 --> 00:28:20,700
when it cost you a hundred or a
thousand or even ten dollars to

480
00:28:20,700 --> 00:28:25,700
do something and it takes you
10, 10 hours, 20 hours to test

481
00:28:25,700 --> 00:28:28,200
it.
You don't test that many things.

482
00:28:28,200 --> 00:28:29,900
You have to go with by
necessity.

483
00:28:29,900 --> 00:28:32,400
The things that look like
they're going to have Roi, but

484
00:28:32,400 --> 00:28:35,200
when the Cost of testing, a
thousand things is basically

485
00:28:35,200 --> 00:28:38,500
zero and you can test it
thousand things and a minute.

486
00:28:39,400 --> 00:28:43,000
Things change dramatically, you,
you can explore horizontally.

487
00:28:43,000 --> 00:28:45,300
A lot more than you could
before, you can test a really

488
00:28:45,300 --> 00:28:48,800
dumb ideas and sometimes those
dumb ideas turned out to be

489
00:28:48,800 --> 00:28:52,100
really interesting useful ideas
and that's going to happen

490
00:28:52,100 --> 00:28:53,800
everywhere.
So it's not just generating

491
00:28:53,800 --> 00:28:58,500
media, it's generating
information of any kind but it

492
00:28:58,500 --> 00:29:00,900
will be.
The reason we see media is

493
00:29:00,900 --> 00:29:04,200
because we have a public open
internet and everyone dumps all

494
00:29:04,200 --> 00:29:07,400
their data online.
So guess what they trained on is

495
00:29:07,400 --> 00:29:10,600
the stuff that there was a lot
of data for but there is data

496
00:29:10,600 --> 00:29:13,800
for other stuff.
It's a little harder to get, and

497
00:29:13,900 --> 00:29:16,700
it's a little less, lucrative up
front and a little harder to

498
00:29:16,700 --> 00:29:22,900
build, but it's coming.
So any information fundamentally

499
00:29:23,400 --> 00:29:26,200
whether it's science
experiments, you know,

500
00:29:26,300 --> 00:29:29,400
generating novel drug compounds.
All of this stuff is just

501
00:29:29,400 --> 00:29:34,000
information genetics.
So, if you want to test

502
00:29:34,000 --> 00:29:37,800
something out to just 80 or 90%
Fidelity really, really, really

503
00:29:37,800 --> 00:29:41,200
fast and then that last 10, 20
percent is still done with

504
00:29:41,200 --> 00:29:43,100
humans and maybe regular
computers.

505
00:29:44,100 --> 00:29:47,100
That's a big change, its a
couple orders of magnitude, I

506
00:29:47,100 --> 00:29:49,000
think in terms of like speed of
innovation.

507
00:29:49,000 --> 00:29:51,600
So that's that's a huge use case
for the generative Networks.

508
00:29:53,100 --> 00:29:58,600
That's you know like it it's
like very enlightening outside

509
00:29:58,700 --> 00:30:02,500
thinking about doing simulations
using these Technologies because

510
00:30:02,500 --> 00:30:06,400
they can generate different.
Let's say prototype for you but

511
00:30:06,900 --> 00:30:15,000
there are some people that they
are arguing that we might be too

512
00:30:15,000 --> 00:30:19,200
much dependent on the existing
knowledge that already these

513
00:30:19,600 --> 00:30:22,700
molded they have so we'll be
lazy to generate in.

514
00:30:22,800 --> 00:30:25,700
New content for the language
Maltese to use.

515
00:30:26,000 --> 00:30:30,100
What do you think about that?
I think.

516
00:30:31,800 --> 00:30:38,400
How much does it cost to get the
best aircraft modeler, the best

517
00:30:38,400 --> 00:30:41,700
car modeler to do something?
A lot of money.

518
00:30:42,000 --> 00:30:46,200
How much does it cost to get 80
to 90% of the best?

519
00:30:46,700 --> 00:30:50,400
Still, probably quite a bit.
So the difference is okay.

520
00:30:50,400 --> 00:30:53,900
Yes.
If even if we, let's say I'll

521
00:30:53,900 --> 00:30:58,700
buy that argument and we can
only get to even 80% of the

522
00:30:58,700 --> 00:31:01,400
average of any skill given has
enough training.

523
00:31:02,700 --> 00:31:04,500
Who cares, right?
All it's doing is repeating

524
00:31:04,500 --> 00:31:07,400
existing patterns.
Well, what matters is that I

525
00:31:07,400 --> 00:31:11,100
don't have to learn a skill.
I can have 0% car modeling

526
00:31:11,100 --> 00:31:13,000
knowledge and now I can model a
car.

527
00:31:13,400 --> 00:31:17,100
That's a very big deal just in
the Practical perspective like

528
00:31:17,100 --> 00:31:20,100
for my stories right?
I can do the cover art.

529
00:31:20,500 --> 00:31:22,600
I can't do cover art before
this.

530
00:31:22,600 --> 00:31:27,200
I spent $250 or $500 for like
incredible concept art and it

531
00:31:27,200 --> 00:31:31,700
took weeks of back and forth and
it was a huge pain and Half the

532
00:31:31,700 --> 00:31:33,000
time.
It doesn't end up looking right

533
00:31:33,000 --> 00:31:35,400
now.
I can just, I don't know, just

534
00:31:35,400 --> 00:31:37,600
throw stuff at the wall.
I'll just do it for four hours

535
00:31:37,600 --> 00:31:40,800
and I've generated a couple
hundred pictures and it cost me

536
00:31:40,808 --> 00:31:44,400
basically nothing.
You can imagine that for any

537
00:31:44,400 --> 00:31:49,100
Fields, like you don't have to
learn a skill to do it at 80%

538
00:31:49,100 --> 00:31:53,700
capacity of average like the
average professional, that's a

539
00:31:53,700 --> 00:31:57,500
very big deal and so you don't
even have to Advanced

540
00:31:57,500 --> 00:32:00,600
state-of-the-art in order for it
to matter significantly.

541
00:32:00,600 --> 00:32:02,900
It's about democracy.
Ization of skill set.

542
00:32:05,500 --> 00:32:08,500
Well, that that's another point
of view.

543
00:32:08,500 --> 00:32:11,800
I would say which is also valid
Stephen, can you 10?

544
00:32:11,800 --> 00:32:15,000
Because I know you're right,
sci-fi also as well, right?

545
00:32:15,000 --> 00:32:18,900
So have you tell us a little bit
more about this side?

546
00:32:19,900 --> 00:32:23,100
I'm sure that I have a lot of my
audience who would be interested

547
00:32:23,100 --> 00:32:29,100
to know more?
Yeah, it's just for fun but I do

548
00:32:29,100 --> 00:32:31,600
occasionally try to write.
Sometimes there's a combination

549
00:32:31,600 --> 00:32:33,800
of these.
So it's sci-fi and fantasy.

550
00:32:33,800 --> 00:32:36,800
So Fantasies mostly for fun.
I always try to have a lesson.

551
00:32:38,400 --> 00:32:42,500
So I've written a story recently
called reverie, that is a story

552
00:32:42,500 --> 00:32:46,900
about I think that Humanity
doesn't have a lot of great

553
00:32:46,900 --> 00:32:49,700
things to run towards like
Collective goals.

554
00:32:50,000 --> 00:32:53,200
I think we have a lot of things
we're trying to avoid but that's

555
00:32:53,200 --> 00:32:56,300
not super motivating who gets up
every day saying oh I hope I

556
00:32:56,300 --> 00:32:57,800
don't hope I'm not in pain
today.

557
00:32:58,200 --> 00:33:02,500
This has super motivating so I
tried to come up with.

558
00:33:02,500 --> 00:33:05,200
Here's where I think we should
try to go as a species.

559
00:33:06,700 --> 00:33:09,000
I'm writing a story.
Now called hell makers.

560
00:33:09,400 --> 00:33:13,100
This is about this.
Why I smiled when you mentioned

561
00:33:14,100 --> 00:33:18,200
I think you mentioned something
about Bots Autumn a pot.

562
00:33:18,900 --> 00:33:23,100
So already I've seen people talk
about, somebody has already had

563
00:33:23,100 --> 00:33:26,700
the bright idea, you know, would
be great, we should do, we need

564
00:33:26,700 --> 00:33:29,000
to open source these models
because you know, people

565
00:33:29,000 --> 00:33:30,800
probably don't want us to have
access to this.

566
00:33:30,800 --> 00:33:32,600
It's everything should be free
and open.

567
00:33:32,900 --> 00:33:35,700
You know what else we should do?
We should put this on

568
00:33:35,700 --> 00:33:37,500
decentralized Computing,
platforms?

569
00:33:37,500 --> 00:33:41,500
This is a good idea and I'm just
like this is the worst idea.

570
00:33:41,700 --> 00:33:43,300
Let me write a story to tell you
why.

571
00:33:43,700 --> 00:33:47,600
So oh it's a basically a story
about the founder of a

572
00:33:47,600 --> 00:33:50,700
decentralized digital autonomous
worker protocol.

573
00:33:51,700 --> 00:33:54,600
They just start like a
decentralized Computing

574
00:33:55,100 --> 00:33:59,400
blockchain protocol right?
The goal is that uses a

575
00:33:59,400 --> 00:34:02,400
consensus mechanism so you can't
turn it off easily unless you

576
00:34:02,408 --> 00:34:04,400
can turn off all the nodes on
the network.

577
00:34:05,600 --> 00:34:08,600
You can't turn it off and it's
permission list so anyone can

578
00:34:08,600 --> 00:34:11,800
insert money and you insert a
prompt pull a model off the

579
00:34:11,800 --> 00:34:15,199
shelf and you go tell it to do
something and Go do whatever

580
00:34:15,199 --> 00:34:18,699
until it runs out of money and
you can't turn it off.

581
00:34:19,199 --> 00:34:22,500
So I show this is probably not a
good idea.

582
00:34:22,900 --> 00:34:28,000
So, punch line of the story is
that the creator of the protocol

583
00:34:28,000 --> 00:34:31,400
ends up using this to get back
at their co-founders, who cut

584
00:34:31,400 --> 00:34:35,800
them out of a deal.
And as the name implies creates

585
00:34:35,800 --> 00:34:40,300
a bot that literally just
publicly tries to ruin this

586
00:34:40,300 --> 00:34:43,900
other person in perpetuity, and
cannot be turned off.

587
00:34:44,100 --> 00:34:45,699
Off.
So this is not good.

588
00:34:46,000 --> 00:34:49,100
We should think very carefully
about not having an off switch

589
00:34:49,100 --> 00:34:51,500
for our machines.
It just seemed like a very dumb

590
00:34:51,500 --> 00:34:56,199
idea to put them on a box that
you can't turn off correctly.

591
00:34:57,500 --> 00:35:04,300
Hey, hey question that I asked.
Now you became a legend question

592
00:35:04,300 --> 00:35:09,500
for me.
Like do you think that is

593
00:35:09,600 --> 00:35:14,700
allowing all of us Humanity to
read to reach singularity?

594
00:35:20,400 --> 00:35:24,600
Maybe.
Good question.

595
00:35:24,600 --> 00:35:29,600
I know sir the key is in what
you said at the end which is all

596
00:35:29,600 --> 00:35:32,100
of us and Humanity to reach the
singularity.

597
00:35:32,100 --> 00:35:35,800
Yes, I actually think that
positive outcomes are the most

598
00:35:35,800 --> 00:35:38,000
likely scenario in the long
term.

599
00:35:38,000 --> 00:35:41,100
And there's a lot we can do
about it and a lot of things

600
00:35:41,100 --> 00:35:43,500
that we could be doing about it.
That are actually quite feasible

601
00:35:43,700 --> 00:35:45,400
that are probably not well
known.

602
00:35:45,900 --> 00:35:50,500
So it's something I'm focused on
but yes, I think technically

603
00:35:50,500 --> 00:35:51,300
speaking.
Yes.

604
00:35:51,500 --> 00:35:55,400
This is the way you would need
scaled intelligence.

605
00:35:55,400 --> 00:35:59,600
And I think the most important
part of AI is moving us towards

606
00:35:59,600 --> 00:36:03,600
Singularity, is that maybe is
also under appreciated is that

607
00:36:03,600 --> 00:36:07,700
doesn't have cognitive biases.
Unlike our own brains, we can

608
00:36:07,700 --> 00:36:11,600
reprogram it and we can program
away the blind spots that we

609
00:36:11,600 --> 00:36:14,000
know we have.
It doesn't matter if you know

610
00:36:14,000 --> 00:36:19,300
about anchoring bias, or recency
bias, if you still did you

611
00:36:19,308 --> 00:36:21,100
experience them whether you want
them or not?

612
00:36:21,300 --> 00:36:25,000
You So, make dumb choices all
the, if you're tired and hungry,

613
00:36:25,300 --> 00:36:28,000
you're gonna make bad choices.
Like this is just how the human

614
00:36:28,000 --> 00:36:31,500
brain works.
You can't program around it, but

615
00:36:31,500 --> 00:36:33,100
that's not the same for our
machines.

616
00:36:33,100 --> 00:36:35,900
Which means that we should be
able to program them to our

617
00:36:35,900 --> 00:36:38,000
ideals.
And as long as we can keep

618
00:36:38,000 --> 00:36:41,300
advancing them, I don't see why
you know you can't have

619
00:36:41,300 --> 00:36:43,600
wonderful incredible outcomes
from that.

620
00:36:43,600 --> 00:36:46,600
So ensure yes but I think it's
neutral.

621
00:36:46,800 --> 00:36:51,000
It depends on what we do.
That's that's fair enough.

622
00:36:51,000 --> 00:36:55,500
I would say before I will you
know keep it for you to do a

623
00:36:55,500 --> 00:36:58,700
final conclusion.
Not related to a I related

624
00:36:58,700 --> 00:37:00,700
because you are a solopreneur,
right?

625
00:37:01,000 --> 00:37:06,400
So How?
How do you see it?

626
00:37:06,500 --> 00:37:08,400
Like, what's your experience
being a solopreneur?

627
00:37:08,400 --> 00:37:10,900
Because again, this is this is
the second.

628
00:37:11,500 --> 00:37:13,900
Common question, I'm asking to
my guest, if there are

629
00:37:13,900 --> 00:37:18,400
solopreneurs like why you opted
to be a solopreneur like why

630
00:37:18,400 --> 00:37:22,000
you're mad part of I know that
you work for some companies

631
00:37:22,000 --> 00:37:23,800
before and I did by the way as
well.

632
00:37:23,800 --> 00:37:29,000
I'm a solopreneur I'm off now.
So tell me your experience as a

633
00:37:29,000 --> 00:37:32,900
solopreneur and why we are
seeing more solopreneurs in the

634
00:37:32,900 --> 00:37:38,300
field.
The answer, the last one first

635
00:37:38,300 --> 00:37:41,700
because it's fairly simple.
I think we're seeing more people

636
00:37:41,700 --> 00:37:44,200
are more isolated in general but
I think we're also more

637
00:37:44,200 --> 00:37:46,100
empowered by technology in
general.

638
00:37:46,200 --> 00:37:48,600
Like I mentioned like I can do a
lot of things.

639
00:37:48,600 --> 00:37:52,800
I don't know how to do thanks to
advances in Ai and other

640
00:37:52,800 --> 00:37:56,600
software, right?
I don't know how to compute

641
00:37:56,600 --> 00:37:58,800
compound interest.
I mean, I could do it by hand if

642
00:37:58,800 --> 00:38:01,600
you gave me the formula and a
lot of time but spreadsheet can

643
00:38:01,600 --> 00:38:04,900
do it.
So I'm an able to do a lot by

644
00:38:04,900 --> 00:38:08,600
myself and because I'm working
in software and AI which is like

645
00:38:08,600 --> 00:38:12,800
software for software.
It's, I can I have a lot of

646
00:38:12,800 --> 00:38:19,400
Leverage so I am enabled to do
it but also at the same time,

647
00:38:20,000 --> 00:38:22,900
it's often easier just to pay
contractors and I find that

648
00:38:22,900 --> 00:38:26,200
there is a sort of cultural
Zeitgeist Movement towards

649
00:38:28,100 --> 00:38:31,200
people who want their own
autonomy and they want to

650
00:38:31,208 --> 00:38:34,700
interface with other people as
people and they don't want to be

651
00:38:34,700 --> 00:38:37,900
an employee.
So I found it very easy to just,

652
00:38:37,900 --> 00:38:40,500
hey, what's your rate like,
let's figure out a deal.

653
00:38:40,500 --> 00:38:43,300
It's figure out a partnership
and that has been the easier way

654
00:38:43,300 --> 00:38:45,800
to go.
So that's the answer to the

655
00:38:45,800 --> 00:38:47,700
second part.
So the first part, my experience

656
00:38:47,700 --> 00:38:53,400
is a solopreneur I think that
the challenge especially with a

657
00:38:53,400 --> 00:38:56,300
I right, so selling software
development is fairly

658
00:38:56,300 --> 00:39:00,500
straightforward because people
understand, you didn't how to

659
00:39:00,800 --> 00:39:04,200
how to Value it.
The biggest challenge of getting

660
00:39:04,200 --> 00:39:09,300
paid build stuff with AI is how
to help people understand the

661
00:39:09,300 --> 00:39:13,300
opportunities that they have and
how to help them value it.

662
00:39:13,800 --> 00:39:16,700
It's there's a lot of work that
has to be done.

663
00:39:16,800 --> 00:39:18,900
You don't have to do a lot of
work to tell people.

664
00:39:19,000 --> 00:39:22,000
All about regular Software
System, they already know how to

665
00:39:22,000 --> 00:39:24,200
reason about it.
There's a lot of competitors,

666
00:39:24,200 --> 00:39:29,300
they know what to compare it to.
It's very simple but for for AI,

667
00:39:29,300 --> 00:39:32,200
there's a long conversation of
Education.

668
00:39:32,500 --> 00:39:33,900
Okay.
Here's what is possible.

669
00:39:34,000 --> 00:39:35,900
Okay.
Now I need to fully understand

670
00:39:35,900 --> 00:39:38,700
your business so that I can
analyze.

671
00:39:39,200 --> 00:39:43,000
Okay, where's the opportunity?
And then from there I have to

672
00:39:43,008 --> 00:39:45,600
help you understand what the
value is that we can justify the

673
00:39:45,600 --> 00:39:48,400
cost, which is higher than
regular software, a lot of

674
00:39:48,408 --> 00:39:49,100
steps.
Soooo.

675
00:39:49,500 --> 00:39:51,600
So yeah, it's a very high trust
thing.

676
00:39:52,600 --> 00:39:56,600
Also, I noticed that Most
businesses.

677
00:39:56,900 --> 00:39:59,400
So, again, this is just money
from Consulting, not building my

678
00:39:59,400 --> 00:40:03,400
own products, most businesses
would benefit, they're not even

679
00:40:03,400 --> 00:40:06,200
fully utilizing software, then
it's definitely not even fully

680
00:40:06,200 --> 00:40:11,500
using non software Solutions.
And so AI is often, like, why

681
00:40:11,500 --> 00:40:14,400
would you bring this really
complex solution and because

682
00:40:14,400 --> 00:40:17,000
it's sexy.
It's got Buzz words, but I've

683
00:40:17,000 --> 00:40:22,700
found so far for the most part
price optimization retention

684
00:40:22,700 --> 00:40:26,000
prediction.
Collaborative filtering.

685
00:40:26,000 --> 00:40:31,800
Just even just regression like
linear or logistic regression to

686
00:40:31,800 --> 00:40:35,700
statistical models.
These are often like 80/20, so

687
00:40:35,700 --> 00:40:37,700
most people don't need the big
guns.

688
00:40:38,800 --> 00:40:43,300
That is the cool stuff for sure.
I'd say generative AI, the large

689
00:40:43,300 --> 00:40:46,800
language models changes things a
little bit, but by and large,

690
00:40:47,100 --> 00:40:49,600
you don't need AI for most
solutions.

691
00:40:50,100 --> 00:40:53,800
So a lot of the challenge is
finding the people who really do

692
00:40:53,800 --> 00:40:58,400
have a slam-dunk use case and
building the trust telling the

693
00:40:58,400 --> 00:41:02,100
story.
So yeah that's that's what it's

694
00:41:02,100 --> 00:41:05,400
like is that there's a lot of
legwork that's sort of the AI

695
00:41:05,400 --> 00:41:09,500
side.
Damn, that's fair enough.

696
00:41:09,500 --> 00:41:12,500
I would say and I have to agree
with a lot of the points that

697
00:41:12,500 --> 00:41:15,600
you mentioned Steven.
Steven any final thing.

698
00:41:15,600 --> 00:41:18,700
You maybe something.
I didn't ask you, you want to

699
00:41:18,800 --> 00:41:27,400
say or shared before we close.
Well, my producer and the social

700
00:41:27,400 --> 00:41:30,800
media growth manager would
probably hit me over the head if

701
00:41:30,800 --> 00:41:33,100
I didn't say go to the YouTube
channel.

702
00:41:33,600 --> 00:41:36,600
Yes, he can Minima.
Yes.

703
00:41:37,800 --> 00:41:41,700
But so I mean do that if you
want to hear more words like

704
00:41:41,700 --> 00:41:45,600
this actually I wanted to ask
where people can find more about

705
00:41:45,600 --> 00:41:50,600
you.
I get better at this guy's butt.

706
00:41:51,000 --> 00:41:56,200
So what I wanted to say is I
want to the whole purpose of

707
00:41:56,200 --> 00:41:59,000
seeking minnemann generals isn't
not-for-profit thing.

708
00:41:59,000 --> 00:42:02,100
Like I can just build software,
like there's no point according

709
00:42:02,100 --> 00:42:05,700
videos or talking to people like
you for for a living.

710
00:42:05,700 --> 00:42:10,200
That's not what I want to do.
I am trying to help people use

711
00:42:10,200 --> 00:42:14,600
technology and to create better
outcomes for everybody.

712
00:42:15,100 --> 00:42:19,400
And I think that we are at a
fairly pivotable pivotal moment

713
00:42:19,400 --> 00:42:24,900
and I see a lot of, despite some
of the Pessimistic take so far.

714
00:42:25,200 --> 00:42:27,200
That's not really how I look at
the world.

715
00:42:27,400 --> 00:42:30,800
I think that we have a lot of
opportunity to make a big

716
00:42:30,800 --> 00:42:34,900
difference right now, and I want
to help people realize that they

717
00:42:34,900 --> 00:42:37,300
don't need to stand here and
look scared.

718
00:42:38,100 --> 00:42:43,400
There's a lot we can do in terms
of AI alignment, wealth

719
00:42:43,400 --> 00:42:45,700
inequality.
We have a lot of tools at our

720
00:42:45,700 --> 00:42:49,900
disposal, and we're really sweet
spot where there's most of the

721
00:42:49,900 --> 00:42:53,800
stuff is Greenfield brand-new.
We have a lot of Ready to use it

722
00:42:53,800 --> 00:42:57,400
well to put Common Sense rules
in place and to really set it up

723
00:42:57,400 --> 00:43:01,100
to work for us instead of
against us or for a select few

724
00:43:01,100 --> 00:43:05,100
people few people and I think
that I'm going to continue

725
00:43:05,100 --> 00:43:08,200
exploring those things.
I have a lot of concrete ideas

726
00:43:08,200 --> 00:43:10,900
but also just like to synthesize
other people's ideas.

727
00:43:11,500 --> 00:43:16,100
There's no need to be terrified
at the future because we have a

728
00:43:16,108 --> 00:43:19,000
lot of control over it.
We're the ones who control it.

729
00:43:19,000 --> 00:43:21,200
I don't know if people seem to
forget that as a, by the way,

730
00:43:21,600 --> 00:43:24,800
the future?
What Your happens is based on

731
00:43:24,800 --> 00:43:28,700
what we do, so if you don't like
it, you should do something

732
00:43:28,700 --> 00:43:30,700
about.
And that's that's what I'm

733
00:43:30,700 --> 00:43:32,100
doing.
If you're interested in that

734
00:43:32,100 --> 00:43:35,700
too, then, yeah, I'd love to
keep talking with you.

735
00:43:36,600 --> 00:43:40,400
That's the really great and I
think we are only same Mission.

736
00:43:40,400 --> 00:43:44,300
I would say Steven because one
of the reasons I'm doing all,

737
00:43:44,300 --> 00:43:49,400
you know, this podcast, I'm
creating a lot of content is to

738
00:43:49,400 --> 00:43:53,200
raise awareness.
This is until people You know

739
00:43:53,200 --> 00:43:57,400
like, hey, you know, it's not
like only the scary stuff you

740
00:43:57,400 --> 00:44:01,100
see in the media, you know, like
people gonna lose their jobs.

741
00:44:01,100 --> 00:44:03,400
I don't know what, you know, all
this negativity.

742
00:44:03,400 --> 00:44:08,500
So I'm trying to put some light
on the postage side of the

743
00:44:08,500 --> 00:44:13,200
technology and not just AI, by
the way any technology because I

744
00:44:13,200 --> 00:44:17,000
love technology myself, like,
since I was a child and I always

745
00:44:17,000 --> 00:44:23,000
believed that Technology's main
goal is to take us forward.

746
00:44:23,100 --> 00:44:26,900
Our life's easy from business
perspective, it's always I'm

747
00:44:26,900 --> 00:44:30,200
repeating myself.
Multiple episodes, increase

748
00:44:30,200 --> 00:44:35,300
revenues increased customer
base, decrease churn, all these

749
00:44:35,300 --> 00:44:40,500
nice things that business people
like to hear and AI is no

750
00:44:40,500 --> 00:44:43,800
different than this way.
I will make you know your

751
00:44:43,800 --> 00:44:47,900
business Thrive and better and
for individuals and saying

752
00:44:47,900 --> 00:44:51,100
exactly what you mentioned at
the beginning also as well guys.

753
00:44:51,100 --> 00:44:54,600
Like if you are scared of
Something go study like this is

754
00:44:54,600 --> 00:44:57,000
the best thing you can do
because if you just keep

755
00:44:57,000 --> 00:45:01,000
watching it and do nothing, yeah
you're going to be scared.

756
00:45:01,000 --> 00:45:02,400
I'd sorry.
I cannot help this.

757
00:45:02,400 --> 00:45:04,400
Why?
I'm trying to help you in

758
00:45:04,400 --> 00:45:07,300
generating this contact as much
as I can, of course.

759
00:45:08,600 --> 00:45:12,000
So yeah, this is why we are
aligned at the structure why I

760
00:45:12,000 --> 00:45:15,000
wanted to interview you Stephen
because when I read your bio,

761
00:45:15,400 --> 00:45:19,000
this What attracted me?
And by the way, this is I do

762
00:45:19,000 --> 00:45:21,400
with all my guests.
I would share, you know, the

763
00:45:21,400 --> 00:45:22,900
YouTube channel like anything
else.

764
00:45:23,100 --> 00:45:26,000
I can find if you want to share
that, with me also as well, so

765
00:45:26,000 --> 00:45:29,200
that would go into the
description of the episode and

766
00:45:29,500 --> 00:45:33,700
the description on the YouTube
also, as well, when we came to

767
00:45:33,700 --> 00:45:37,100
an end, Steven thank you very
much for being my guest today.

768
00:45:37,100 --> 00:45:40,200
I really appreciate the time,
and I sure hope.

769
00:45:40,700 --> 00:45:43,500
Thank you very much and for my
accordions, whether you are

770
00:45:43,500 --> 00:45:46,900
watching this on YouTube or you
are listening, using your

771
00:45:47,900 --> 00:45:52,900
favorite food casting platform,
don't forget to subscribe and as

772
00:45:53,000 --> 00:45:56,800
As usual, I'm telling you guys,
I would love to hear your

773
00:45:56,800 --> 00:46:00,100
feedback about this episode or
about the show in general.

774
00:46:00,400 --> 00:46:03,100
If you are interested to be a
guest like Stephen today, now

775
00:46:03,400 --> 00:46:07,600
don't be shy, please come up
with the idea that you want to

776
00:46:07,608 --> 00:46:10,600
discuss and I will be more than
happy to have you as a guest

777
00:46:10,600 --> 00:46:14,300
with me and as usual until we
meet next time.

778
00:46:14,300 --> 00:46:16,300
Thank you very much and we'll
see you soon.